Understanding Dispensationalism
- Brian Lee
- Jul 11
- 3 min read
To properly understand the Book of Revelation, it is essential to be aware of a particular theological lens known as Dispensationalism. Here's a summary.
dis·pen·sa·tion·al·ism /ˌdispənˈsāSHənlˌizəm/ noun Belief in a system of historical progression, as revealed in the Bible, consisting of a series of stages in God's self-revelation and plan of salvation.
Dispensationalism is a theological framework that organizes redemptive history into a series of distinct “dispensations” or administrations in which God interacts with humanity in different ways. It is marked by a literal interpretation of biblical prophecy, a sharp distinction between Israel and the Church, and an emphasis on future eschatological events, including a pre-tribulational rapture and a literal millennial kingdom.
1. Origin and Development
Dispensationalism began in the early 19th century with John Nelson Darby of the Plymouth Brethren movement and was later popularized in the United States through the Scofield Reference Bible (1909), which heavily influenced 20th-century evangelical theology.
Charles Ryrie, one of the most prominent modern dispensationalists, defines a dispensation as:
“a distinguishable economy in the outworking of God’s purpose.”
— Ryrie, "Dispensationalism" (Rev. ed., Moody, 2007), p. 29
2. Core Tenets of Dispensationalism
a) Historical Periodization
Dispensationalists typically divide history into seven dispensations (though some use fewer):
Innocence
Conscience
Human Government
Promise
Law
Grace (Church Age)
Kingdom (Millennium)
Each dispensation is marked by a test, failure, and divine judgment.

See: C. I. Scofield, Scofield Reference Bible (1909); Ryrie, "Dispensationalism," pp. 50–60
b) Israel–Church Distinction
Dispensationalism maintains that God has two distinct peoples:
Israel, with earthly promises (land, kingdom)
The Church, with spiritual and heavenly promises.
God's promises to Israel (such as in Genesis 12, 15, 17) will be literally fulfilled in the future during a restored Jewish millennium.
“The basic premise of dispensationalism is two purposes of God expressed in the formation of two peoples who maintain their distinction throughout eternity.”
— Ryrie, "Dispensationalism," p. 45
c) Literal Interpretation of Prophecy
Prophecy is interpreted literally, unless context demands otherwise. This means symbols in Revelation (e.g., the four horsemen) are often treated as future, chronological events.
“The golden rule of interpretation is: When the plain sense of Scripture makes common sense, seek no other sense.”
— David L. Cooper, cited in Ryrie, p. 80
d) Futuristic Eschatology
Dispensationalism holds a pretribulational premillennial eschatology:
A secret rapture will remove the Church (1 Thess. 4:16–17)
A literal seven-year tribulation will follow (based on Daniel 9:24–27)
Christ will return to establish a literal 1,000-year reign on earth (Rev. 20:1–6)
See: John F. Walvoord, "The Rapture Question" (Zondervan, 1979); Tim LaHaye and Thomas Ice, "Charting the End Times" (Harvest House, 2001)
3. Distinction from Reformed Theology
Reformed theologians, including those in the Amillennial and Covenant Theology traditions, reject Dispensationalism for several reasons:
It divides redemptive history unnaturally.
It separates Israel and the Church, while Reformed theology sees one covenant people throughout Scripture.
It emphasizes eschatological speculation, which can distract from Christ-centered interpretation.
“Dispensationalism has a defective doctrine of the church and of the unity of the covenant of grace.”— Anthony Hoekema, "The Bible and the Future" (Eerdmans, 1979), pp. 195–210
G.K. Beale, in "The Book of Revelation" (NIGTC, Eerdmans, 1999), explains that Revelation is primarily symbolic and pastoral, not a literal roadmap of future events. I concur with him.
Summary of Dispensationalism
View of History Divided into distinct dispensations
Israel and Church Kept separate in God’s plan
Prophecy Interpreted literally
Eschatology Pretribulational, premillennial
Key Figures J.N. Darby, C.I. Scofield, Charles Ryrie, John Walvoord
Comments